Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients is Illegal and Unnecessary Essay

Drug Testing for Welf atomic number 18 Recipients is Illegal and Unnecessary - Essay ExampleEmployees are needed to prove their innocence while showing no outward signs of using illegal doses. M all would say that violates not only the U.S. Constitution but the precepts of any free society. A more egregious example of an overzealous drug policy is the recent growing trend to require welfare recipients, residents of public hold and other forms of public assistance to be tested for drugs prior to receiving assistance. These policies do not save money or lower the rate of drug use. What they do is oppress and humiliate the most vulnerable of society, the distressing and minorities, and constitute a considerable and unwarranted invasion of privacy. At the heart of this passionate political knock over are demeaning and inaccurate portrayals of people who typically receive welfare, characterizations that are not supported by evidence. One such stereotype is of the drug or alcohol addi cted welfare queen who continues to bear children so the amount of her assistance checks increase and she can buy more drugs. Drug examen the poor is unquestionable popular among voters due to the prevailing yet misinformed opinion that the poor are lazy and undeserving of government help, why should I work to pay up for them to sit at home all day? is a commonly heard phrase. ... The facts, however, mirror this perception. Laws meant to purge the system from drug abusing welfare cheats do not accomplish what they are intended to do and are most likely unconstitutional. For example, drug testing people on welfare is supposed to save money, thats the main argument. The 2008 Great Recession caused a great financial hardship to individuals as well as all levels of government. Saving money by eliminating eat is a popular political stance but the money saved is relatively small amount and is often go throughed by the cost to implement the testing law. Idaho recently commissioned a s tudy of the likely financial impact of drug testing its welfare applicants. The study found that the costs were likely to exceed any money saved. (Cohen, 2012). An extensive peer-reviewed study found that a only a small minority of public assistance programs recipients such as Medicaid, nutrient stamps, WIC AFDC and SSI, contrary to common opinion, have drug and alcohol problems, about five percent abuse drugs and six percent have an alcohol dependency. (Grant, Dawson, 1996.) A cover up from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism confirmed several other studies which found welfare recipients do not use or abuse drugs or alcohol at a rate higher than the general population. A separate study discovered that nearly three-quarters of adult drug users are have full time jobs. The arguments for drug testing welfare recipients do not square with the facts or the reality of the situation but the laws are politically popular due to the broadly help belief that the poor dese rve unequal status and should be punished by society for their financial circumstance. This society would